<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Best Internet News and Politics</title>
	<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com</link>
	<description>Get your daily does of Political News from around the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Republican Party and Blacks by The Republican Party and Blacks</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/17/the-republican-party-and-blacks/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/17/the-republican-party-and-blacks/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>[...] When Ronald Reagan took office he promised to cut the size of government and to cut government spending. Conservatives talk eloquently about how masterful Reagan was with the budget. They forget to tell you that the budget deficit grew during the Reagan years. No matter how the Republicans like to sugar coat their policies, the fact that under Reagan, Bush and now, George W. Bush the budget deficit has grown completely flies in the face of fiscal responsibility. Even the conservative Cato Institute, in an article by Chris Edwards states, “Reagan’s failure was that he did not control federal spending growth. By 1989, federal spending was up 69 percent from 1981. The deficit widened.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When Ronald Reagan took office he promised to cut the size of government and to cut government spending. Conservatives talk eloquently about how masterful Reagan was with the budget. They forget to tell you that the budget deficit grew during the Reagan years. No matter how the Republicans like to sugar coat their policies, the fact that under Reagan, Bush and now, George W. Bush the budget deficit has grown completely flies in the face of fiscal responsibility. Even the conservative Cato Institute, in an article by Chris Edwards states, “Reagan’s failure was that he did not control federal spending growth. By 1989, federal spending was up 69 percent from 1981. The deficit widened.” [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does a Candidate Need Good Teeth to Run For Office? by Does a Candidate Need Good Teeth to Run For Office?</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/11/does-a-candidate-need-good-teeth-to-run-for-office/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/11/does-a-candidate-need-good-teeth-to-run-for-office/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>[...] It was during a knitting lesson with my Aunt Trudy when I had an epiphany about the election. I told my family who then encouraged me to seek political office. We all jumped in the family van and drove ninety miles to the nearest political office where they dropped me off in the thirty degree weather to ponder my decision. Needless to say I wasn’t entirely sure I wanted to be a politician especially if it involved standing out in the cold. I’ve often thought about running for office, but was discouraged by the lack of toilet paper in government buildings. My polling data which consisted of my wife, daughter and dogs indicated I had a slight chance at becoming a Golf Course ranger which I immediately pursued. I was informed by golf course management that such a position was not an electable one, but I was still welcome to apply. I did just that and got a really cool shirt. On the first day I brought Gus, my goat, to the golf course. In hindsight, it was not my best decision. Gus took a liking to the green on the seventh hole and then proceeded to snack on Mr. Werner’s polyester pants on the tenth hole. Both Gus and I were escorted off the course in due haste. Needless to say my “political” aspirations were hindered. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It was during a knitting lesson with my Aunt Trudy when I had an epiphany about the election. I told my family who then encouraged me to seek political office. We all jumped in the family van and drove ninety miles to the nearest political office where they dropped me off in the thirty degree weather to ponder my decision. Needless to say I wasn’t entirely sure I wanted to be a politician especially if it involved standing out in the cold. I’ve often thought about running for office, but was discouraged by the lack of toilet paper in government buildings. My polling data which consisted of my wife, daughter and dogs indicated I had a slight chance at becoming a Golf Course ranger which I immediately pursued. I was informed by golf course management that such a position was not an electable one, but I was still welcome to apply. I did just that and got a really cool shirt. On the first day I brought Gus, my goat, to the golf course. In hindsight, it was not my best decision. Gus took a liking to the green on the seventh hole and then proceeded to snack on Mr. Werner’s polyester pants on the tenth hole. Both Gus and I were escorted off the course in due haste. Needless to say my “political” aspirations were hindered. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Revolution to Take Back the US Congress by A Revolution to Take Back the US Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/15/a-revolution-to-take-back-the-us-congress-2/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/15/a-revolution-to-take-back-the-us-congress-2/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>[...] I am proposing that we create a popular, bloodless, political revolution in our country. I believe that it is very necessary, very possible, and very doable. The object of this revolution is the destruction of the professional political class which currently dominates and corrupts the US Congress. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I am proposing that we create a popular, bloodless, political revolution in our country. I believe that it is very necessary, very possible, and very doable. The object of this revolution is the destruction of the professional political class which currently dominates and corrupts the US Congress. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Revolution to Take Back the US Congress by Aurora</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/15/a-revolution-to-take-back-the-us-congress-2/#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/15/a-revolution-to-take-back-the-us-congress-2/#comment-86</guid>
					<description>That's a revolutionary idea.  It would require unity and discipline but it could be done.  I hope there are enough people to pull it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a revolutionary idea.  It would require unity and discipline but it could be done.  I hope there are enough people to pull it off.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack and Michelle Obama - What&#8217;s Wrong With Giving a Little Dap? by Paul, Obama Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/10/barack-and-michelle-obama-whats-wrong-with-giving-a-little-dap/#comment-62</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/10/barack-and-michelle-obama-whats-wrong-with-giving-a-little-dap/#comment-62</guid>
					<description>The media is also calling it a 'fist bump.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is also calling it a &#8216;fist bump.&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Betrayal, the Neocons, and John McCain by Henry Gandollph</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-60</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-60</guid>
					<description>I thought the adopted McCain child is female from Bangladesh? I also thought the reason he doesn't talk about her is because he doesn't want his party members discussing the fact she has a brown complexion? 

Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the last time McCain's family/personal life became a part of the primary campaign was back in '04. At the time he was the subject of vicious rumor and Republican originated  vitriol. So much so McCain refused to stand up to GWB's attacks  and lies about McCain's family. (War hero seems to have lost his courage.)
 
Juan McInSane? lol! Is it cool to make fun of a person's condition when it is beyond his control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the adopted McCain child is female from Bangladesh? I also thought the reason he doesn&#8217;t talk about her is because he doesn&#8217;t want his party members discussing the fact she has a brown complexion? </p>
<p>Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the last time McCain&#8217;s family/personal life became a part of the primary campaign was back in &#8216;04. At the time he was the subject of vicious rumor and Republican originated  vitriol. So much so McCain refused to stand up to GWB&#8217;s attacks  and lies about McCain&#8217;s family. (War hero seems to have lost his courage.)</p>
<p>Juan McInSane? lol! Is it cool to make fun of a person&#8217;s condition when it is beyond his control?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Decline of America? by Gene Lalor</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/04/the-decline-of-america/#comment-59</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/04/the-decline-of-america/#comment-59</guid>
					<description>OBAMA XL: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
June 7th, 2008 
Dear Senator Barack Hussein Obama: 

First, congratulations on your victory! 

However, please notice that Senator Clinton merely suspended her candidacy.  As Hillary reminded you last month, anything can happen in June–or in July, August, September, or October.  For that matter, anything can happen over  the next four and a half years should you win the presidency of the United States in November. 

Take another look at her concession speech and decide if she is sincere:  http://www.breitbart.tv/html/106793.html

Surely you’ve heard the “rumors” about the Clintons, and I’m not referring now to blue dress stains, et al.  If not, I’d seriously suggest you read Gregg Jackson’s Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies and pay special attention to Chapter Two which details and documents the many untimely, mysterious deaths that befell Clinton enemies (such as James Bunch) and Clinton friends (Vince Foster) and those who simply knew too much (including 12 bodyguards) about their activities.  You might want to have your aides Google some of their names.  It’s a very enlightening list, and more than a tad scary.

Make no mistake, Senator Obama, Hillary and Billy came wrapped as a package in 1993–recall Bubba’s reference to that 2 for 1 deal?–and they are still one helluva package.  Make no mistake either that they ever give up.  Bubba wanted a third term back in 2000 and still does.  Don’t expect him to be content at Number One Observatory Circle while you entertain potentates at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 

If elected, be advised too that yours would be the First Tri-Partite Presidency in the history of this once-great country:   Barack Hussein Obama/Hillary Rodham Clinton/William Jefferson Clinton.  Titles such as Vice President or First Spouse will have no relevance.  With their many committed buddies, their lust for control, their total lack of conscience, the Dynamic Duo will cripple your administration from the get-go should you not yield to their power grabbing.  One way or another, they will seize the presidency.

You had better hope you don’t suffer the fate of the aformentioned Clinton enemies, friends, and those who simply knew too much about them.

Watch your back, Obama, and rest assured that others are watching it too, but not protectively.  It wouldn’t be a bad idea to triple your Secret Service detail.

Sincerely,

An American

Tags: , ELECTION 2008, GREGG JACKSON, HILLARY, OBAMA, THE CLINTONS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA XL: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES<br />
June 7th, 2008<br />
Dear Senator Barack Hussein Obama: </p>
<p>First, congratulations on your victory! </p>
<p>However, please notice that Senator Clinton merely suspended her candidacy.  As Hillary reminded you last month, anything can happen in June–or in July, August, September, or October.  For that matter, anything can happen over  the next four and a half years should you win the presidency of the United States in November. </p>
<p>Take another look at her concession speech and decide if she is sincere:  <a href='http://www.breitbart.tv/html/106793.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.breitbart.tv/html/106793.html</a></p>
<p>Surely you’ve heard the “rumors” about the Clintons, and I’m not referring now to blue dress stains, et al.  If not, I’d seriously suggest you read Gregg Jackson’s Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies and pay special attention to Chapter Two which details and documents the many untimely, mysterious deaths that befell Clinton enemies (such as James Bunch) and Clinton friends (Vince Foster) and those who simply knew too much (including 12 bodyguards) about their activities.  You might want to have your aides Google some of their names.  It’s a very enlightening list, and more than a tad scary.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, Senator Obama, Hillary and Billy came wrapped as a package in 1993–recall Bubba’s reference to that 2 for 1 deal?–and they are still one helluva package.  Make no mistake either that they ever give up.  Bubba wanted a third term back in 2000 and still does.  Don’t expect him to be content at Number One Observatory Circle while you entertain potentates at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. </p>
<p>If elected, be advised too that yours would be the First Tri-Partite Presidency in the history of this once-great country:   Barack Hussein Obama/Hillary Rodham Clinton/William Jefferson Clinton.  Titles such as Vice President or First Spouse will have no relevance.  With their many committed buddies, their lust for control, their total lack of conscience, the Dynamic Duo will cripple your administration from the get-go should you not yield to their power grabbing.  One way or another, they will seize the presidency.</p>
<p>You had better hope you don’t suffer the fate of the aformentioned Clinton enemies, friends, and those who simply knew too much about them.</p>
<p>Watch your back, Obama, and rest assured that others are watching it too, but not protectively.  It wouldn’t be a bad idea to triple your Secret Service detail.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>An American</p>
<p>Tags: , ELECTION 2008, GREGG JACKSON, HILLARY, OBAMA, THE CLINTONS
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Betrayal, the Neocons, and John McCain by Michael, the Sin City Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-58</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-58</guid>
					<description>Why do we have to vote for the lesser of 2 evils?  I'm planning on voting for Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party Candidate for President.  Visit www.Baldwin2008.com to learn more about this great candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have to vote for the lesser of 2 evils?  I&#8217;m planning on voting for Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party Candidate for President.  Visit <a href='http://www.Baldwin2008.com' rel='nofollow'>www.Baldwin2008.com</a> to learn more about this great candidate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Betrayal, the Neocons, and John McCain by Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-57</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/06/betrayal-the-neocons-and-john-mccain/#comment-57</guid>
					<description>Got to think about this way though, if you don't agree with McCain 100% and decide even his 10-20% you don't like is enough to keep you from voting for him that likely leaves as the viable choice Obama.  If you vote for a 3rd party instead of McCain that is still a one vote against McCain.  Food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to think about this way though, if you don&#8217;t agree with McCain 100% and decide even his 10-20% you don&#8217;t like is enough to keep you from voting for him that likely leaves as the viable choice Obama.  If you vote for a 3rd party instead of McCain that is still a one vote against McCain.  Food for thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Britain&#8217;s Immigration-Emigration Debate by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/03/britains-immigration-emigration-debate/#comment-55</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestnewspolitics.com/2008/06/03/britains-immigration-emigration-debate/#comment-55</guid>
					<description>I would imagine that a good deal of the emigration going on is simply due to the &quot;shrinking world&quot; factor. The more we learn about opportunites abroad, coupled with the &quot;wanderlust&quot; many of us share, the prospect becomes all too enticing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine that a good deal of the emigration going on is simply due to the &#8220;shrinking world&#8221; factor. The more we learn about opportunites abroad, coupled with the &#8220;wanderlust&#8221; many of us share, the prospect becomes all too enticing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
